Yesterday I predicted that the now considerably politically biased Metropolitan Police would take some time in charging the Muslim individual who carried out a string of Jew hate inspired attacks on people in Stamford Hill in North London. Based on the Met’s somewhat lamentable record of Islamopandering and their failure to charge those involved in the incident earlier this year when Muslim ‘Palestine’ supporters shouted out rape threats to Jewish women in London, I suspected that the Met would either kick this Stamford Hill case under the carpet or take an inordinate amount of time to bring a charge.
Well it seems that I was wrong. The Met have not brushed this case under the carpet or taken an age to bring a charge against the Stamford Hill Muslim Jew hater. They’ve charged a man for these incidents in quite a rapid manner, which is not something I would have expected the Met to do. According to the broadcaster LBC, a man named Abdullah Qureshi has been charged with a string of offences connected to the Stamford Hill incidents.
LBC said:
A man has been charged in connection with a series of unprovoked attacks on Jewish people in north London, the Metropolitan Police said.
Abdullah Qureshi, 28, is due to appear at Thames Magistrates’ Court on Saturday and is facing a number of charges.
One of those is a count of racially or religiously aggravated wounding or grievous bodily harm, there are four counts of racially or religiously aggravated common assault and one count of racially or religiously aggravated criminal damage.
I’m really surprised, pleasantly so in fact, that the Met has charged Qureshi so quickly. I’m sure I was not alone in believing that the Met would string this one out and take an inordinate amount of time before charging, something we’ve seen from the ‘rape threat’ case where arrests were swiftly made but nothing seems to have come of them. However they’ve pulled their fingers out in the Stamford Hill case and that might have been because there was a large amount of CCTV evidence and also because of the massive public outcry about this case. Because of the public outcry and the attention that has been given to this particular case there is no way on earth that the Met could get away with brushing these attacks under the carpet for ‘community cohesion’ reasons.
They’ve obviously agreed with the cps, that when it comes time to trial it’ll either be sent to a wishy washy judge who’ll claim he’s somehow the victim and let him off or if one isn’t available (unlikely I know) they’ll downgrade the charge to “loitering with intent to use a pedestrian crossing”
Like you I wait to be proved wrong, and bonus point if you get the quote.
This is a very swift decision by the police and the CPS. The swiftness of the decision may be down to the wealth of evidence that seems to be available or the public outcry about this case. It will be interesting to see what happens if this guy is convicted. Will there be the sort of exemplary sentence required for someone who has engaged in physical attacks or will he get less than someone who says ‘hurty words’ on Twitter gets? Whilst I have to be careful for sub judice reasons with speculation, I do see a ‘mental health’ excuse or outcome being deployed.
Can I have my bonus point if I say ‘Constable Savage’ from Not the Nine O’Clock News?
Bonus Point awarded, well done.