It only took about a week from the Home Secretary banning the political wing of the genocidal Islamic group Hamas before an Islamic terror group dished out a vague threat to Ms Pritti Patel. This threat to the Home Secretary in which she was called a ‘Zionist agent’, must mean that banning Hamas’s political wing has somewhat discombobulated Hamas.
According to Guido Fawkes, the language used in the threat is similar to that used in condemnations by ‘Palestinian’ terror groups of those who cooperate with the State of Israel. The threat was issued by way of a ‘Palestinian’ news outlet by the Palestinian Islamic Jihad group and says that Ms Patel needs to be ‘held to account’. The Guido article quotes Sir John Jenkins of the Policy Exchange group as saying that the PIJ statement is a form of ‘doublespeak’ which mixes condemnation of the decision to ban the political wing of Hamas with treating Pritti Patel as a ‘collaborator’ with the Israelis. As Arabs who help the Israelis are seen as collaborators and are therefore subjected to death at the hands of the various ‘Palestinian’ terror groups, it’s easy to see PIJ’s words as a threat to the Home Secretary. Sir John also said that the PIJ statement could also be aimed at Hamas supporters in the UK as a call to make the Hamas ban ‘unworkable’.
I’d be extremely surprised if Islamic terrorists were able to get anywhere near Ms Patel as her position means that she would be pretty well protected by the security forces. However this threat might be a prelude to more Islamic terrorism aimed at ordinary Britons as a response to the decision to ban Hamas’s political wing.
This might be an empty threat but then again it might not be. In any event it’s a damned good job that we don’t have 39,000 Islamic extremists on terror watch lists or thousands of Muslim men of fighting age arriving at Dover and Dungeness isn’t it – oh wait!
It is a worrying new development to have groups like PIJ threatening government ministers and something that should elicit a response from the UK government. Maybe that response should be something along the lines of cutting yet more of the overseas aid that either goes directly or via UN agencies to the terror statelet of Gaza?
As our culture is slowly but surely taken away by newcomers who only have hate for us and our nation such things will become ever more common. The UK has for years welcomed those who would destroy us and even given them free accommodation and benefits so they don’t have to spend time working and so have ever day free to plot our downfall. Those who the gods would destroy they first make mad.
I can point to Poles, Litvaks, Hindus, Sikhs and heterodox Muslims like Ahmediyya who don’t hate Britain and who contribute. However that doesn’t diminish your point that we have imported and continue to import many people who do hate us and who come from cultures where such hate is encouraged and celebrated. As a aside I can imagine that this new ban on Hamas and the subsequent threat to the HS might help to flush out some hitherto closet extremists who might end up being dealt with by the authorities. After all you don’t catch a rat unless you bait the trap. Maybe the Hamas ban serves two purposes, one to stop these nutters whipping up hate against Jews and to a lesser extent Christians and two to draw out into the open extremists who might not have made themselves known previously but now will be on the streets protesting the Hamas ban?