Whilst I admit quite freely that men, yes it is predominantly men, of all backgrounds are capable of abuse, when it comes to on street grooming of children and young women by gangs, then those accused or convicted of such crimes are mostly of an Islamic cultural and religious background. Muslim men are disproportionately featured in these crimes especially when compared to the population as a whole. Muslims both male and female, make up are 3.3 million out of a 65 million total population of the UK. If you take out the 50% of that number that are female Muslims then that leaves us with roughly 1.65 Muslim men. This is a relatively small number of Muslim men yet Muslim men are all too often involved in these heinous and Muslim majority rape gangs.
These gangs operate in a completely different way from other paedophiles and sex abusers from the general population. From my study of news reports about these crimes and my experience as a court reporter in the 1980’s, those from the majority population background are mostly lone operators or intra-familial sex offenders. The number of non-Muslim sex abuse gangs is very small. The last major case of this type of any great note is the sex offending and murder gang headed by the paedophile Sidney Cooke who was gaoled in 1999. Also another factor that differentiates sex abuse gangs like that of Cooke’s and the Islamic Rape Gangs is the targeting of those whom the group considers as ‘other’, the choice of out group targets. Whereas nonces from the general population will choose children and young people who are vulnerable to grooming in some way irrespective of the background of the potential victim, it is only the Islamic Rape Gangs who seem to consistently choose victims from outside their own racial and cultural group.
Since the Rotherham and the earlier Rochdale Islamic Rape Gang scandals broke into the public eye nearly a decade ago, we have seen a steady stream of cases where Muslim men have been convicted or charged of massive levels of abuse and sex trafficking. Town after town, city after city has been afflicted by this problem. What’s worse is that up until the Rochdale Case police forces up and down the country were loathe to tackle this problem. Fear of being accused of ‘racism’ for investigating these crimes and a desire to have a quiet life without the threat of rioting Muslim men appears to have been the driving forces behind multiple police forces failing to investigate these horrendous and damaging crimes.
Although this problem of Islamic Rape Gangs is one that can be found anywhere such as in places like Oxford, it is England’s Northern towns and cities that have borne the brunt of these crimes. Huddersfield, Halifax, Rochdale, Rotherham and many more places have been afflicted by these mostly Muslim rape gangs.
Now another case has come to light and which will at some time in the near future come to court. As this is a live case I am constrained by issues of sub judice from commenting too much on it but what I will say is that the accused in this case are remarkably similar in background to those in other Islamic Rape Gang cases and that the alleged offenders are accused of operating between 1995 and 2015, a period of twenty years. This latest case has 42 people who are accused of sexual offences including rape and whose alleged offences are linked to the town of Kirklees. Apart from three women with identifiably English names who are accused of prostitution related offences, all of the other alleged offenders are Muslim men with clearly identifiable Muslim names.
According to a BBC report the defendants and the offences that they have been charged with are:
Donna Lynn, 41, from Heckmondwike, charged with causing the prostitution of a girl under 16, allowing a premises to be used for unlawful sexual intercourse, procuring a female under 21, and controlling prostitution.
Mohammed Yakub, 64, from Dewsbury, charged with an offence of rape.
Nasir Billimoria, 68, from Batley, charged with an offence of rape, and procuring a female under 21.
Yousuf Motala, 69, from Dewsbury, charged with an offence of rape.
Ebrahim Mamaniatt, 52, from Batley, charged with an offence of rape.
Liaquat Ali, 65, from Batley, charged with an offence of rape.
Hashim Sacha, 53, from Batley, charged with an offence of rape.
Nobhar Shah, 69, from Batley, charged with two offences of rape and living on the earnings of prostitution.
Ibrahim Khalifa, 83, from Bradford, charged with an offence of rape.
Manaf Hussain, 47, from Heckmondwike, charged with an offence of rape.
Maria O’Rouke, 42, from Batley, charged with causing the prostitution of a girl under 16, allowing a premises to be used for unlawful sexual intercourse and controlling prostitution.
Riaz Shaikh, 57, from Dewsbury, charged with an offence of rape and an offence of indecent assault.
Amjid Rangzeb, 43, from Batley, charged with an offence of rape and an offence of false imprisonment.
Liaquat Hussain Hanif, 45, from Batley, charged with an offence of rape.
Shakeel Haq, 44, from Birmingham, charged with an offence of rape and an offence of false imprisonment.
Rafiq Patel, 69, from Batley, charged with an offence of rape.
Mohammed Abbas, 60, from Dewsbury, charged with an offence of rape.
Shafaquat Afzal Hussain, 45, from Dewsbury, charged with an offence of rape.
Tariq Azam, 52, from Dewsbury, charged with three offences of rape and three offences of indecent assault.
Aurrangzeb Azam, 50, from Dewsbury, charged with three offences of rape, two offences of indecent assault and an offence of false imprisonment.
Israr Hussain, 46, from Dewsbury, charged with three offences of rape, two offences of indecent assault and an offence of false imprisonment.
Mohammed Sheikh, 48, from Batley, charged with an offence of rape and an offence of indecent assault.
Mohammed Tariq, 62, from Bradford, charged with two offences of rape.
Sajid Majid, 48, from Mirfield, charged with an offence of rape and an offence of indecent assault.
Zulfiquar Ali, 42, from Dewsbury, charged with an offence of rape.
Ansar Mahmood Qayum, 44, from Dewsbury, charged with an offence of rape and an offence of indecent assault.
Mohammed Jabbar Qayum, 40, from Dewsbury, charged with an offence of rape.
Shafiq Siddique, 52, from Dewsbury, charged with an offence of rape and an offence of false imprisonment.
Mohammed Ishtiaq Hussain, 47, from Dewsbury, charged with an offence of rape.
Abbas Kaji, 52, from Batley, charged with an offence of rape.
Mohammed Farooq, 52, from Dewsbury, charged with an offence of rape.
Tasawar Hussain, 42, from Heckmondwike, charged with an offence of rape.
Mohammed Munir Shaffi, 43, from Dewsbury, charged with two offences of rape.
Zaheed Ali Novsarka, 53, from Batley, charged with an offence of rape.
Nassar Liaquat Khan, 42, from Keighley, charged with an offence of rape.
Mohammed Riaz Khan, 47, from Heckmondwike, charged with an offence of rape.
Mohammed Luqman Daji, 44, from Dewsbury, charged with an offence of rape.
Mohammed Ramzan, 64, from Dewsbury, charged with an offence of rape.
Janine Green, 44, from Batley, charged with encouraging prostitution, allowing premises to be used for unlawful sexual intercourse and controlling prostitution.
Ali Shan Waheed, 41, from Dewsbury, charged with rape.
Ismail Seedat, 51, from Batley, charged with indecent assault.
Mohammed Yasin, 48, from Batley, charged with rape.
I could not help but note that there are a large number of defendants who come from the Batley area. This is an area that has long been run by Labour, where previous MP’s such as the late Jo Cox displayed a great deal of Islamophilia and ‘Palestine’ pandering during her time as MP and where a teacher is still in hiding along with his family because of death threats made to him by Muslims because he was accused of ‘blaspheming’ against Islam. Also noteworthy are considerable numbers of defendants from Dewsbury a town long associated with Islamic separatism and extremism. It will be interesting, when these cases are concluded to find out what effort, if any, the local authorities took to safeguard young people who were and are at risk of child sexual exploitation. I suspect that what the trials may reveal may be very interesting on this matter.
There are so many defendants in this case that it is likely that it will be split into several separate trials. Because for contempt of court reasons results of earlier trials related to this case will not be allowed to be reported until all the trials are completed, it is unlikely that the public will hear any results of this case for at least a year, maybe more.
Of course not every Muslim man is a rapist, there are Muslims of my acquaintance who are as horrified as the rest of us are about cases such as these. But let us not delude ourselves that the ideology of Islam or some interpretations of it and the view that Islam promotes of those who live outside of Islam, has nothing to do with the motivations for these offences or alleged offences.
I’m going to hazard a guess that when it all comes out, the police sat on their hands ignoring the problem until it got too big, hoping it would go away but mainly, as you stated, fear of Muslim violence and worse, being called waaaycist or phobic. Odds on too, that the Islamopandering probably Labour council and it’s “diverse” officials, not forgetting the Marxist infested schools, also kept quiet and threw the victims under the bus. What’s the betting that there’ll be a fair amount of victim blaming yet again, presumably because of the treats of violence, but also to retain all of those thousands of corrupt unverifiable mosque-whipped mass Muslim postal votes so many of the politicians have prostituted themselves for. Finally, you can be absolutely certain, that our corrupted, Islamopandering media will keep as quiet as possible to avoid, again, the usual finger-pointing and mock outrage of the usual suspects, tell-mama and others. What you can be certain of, is that anyone making an adverse comment about the Religion of Death will be mercilessly hammered and destroyed. Have your sick-bags at the ready, we’re going to need strong stomachs for the utter crap that various talking heads and prophet fellators are going to spew.
Nearly forgot the punchline: Assuming we hear anything at all in order to “protect community cohesion” and the usual shite. I’d like to think that GB News will break ranks on this one.
I don’t think that any UK broadcaster will breach the Contempt of Court Acts. However there’s more chance of GBN reporting the problem in general than the is of the BBC doing the same.
Not wishing to breach the CCA but I suspect that police indolence in the past may come out with regards this case at some point.
Just a minor point: AFAIK the BBC only regarded this as local news.
Compare and contrast with the https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-59475899
where a neo-Nazi who, whilst vile in his beliefs, had actually harmed no-one at all makes the BBC national news front-page.
Of course there are no double standards here by the BBC.
The BBC as it is presently constituted, not the BBC of the past that did genuinely have viewpoint diversity, is in a position where if it didn’t have double standards then it would have no standards at all.