Sir Beers still wrestling with the hard penis issue.

Labour Leader Sir Keir Starmer.

 

Sir Keir Starmer the Labour Party leader, the man who believes he and his party have got what it takes to run Britain efficiently and effectively is still wriggling over the issue of women and whether or not they have penises.

The Daily Mail said

Sir Keir Starmer appeared to suggest that a ‘small minority’ of women do have penises as the Labour party continued to disagree over transgender issues. 

The Labour leader, who has repeatedly been accused of dodging questions on the topic, has now told LBC that the ‘vast majority’ of women do not have penises. 

He has been under fire previously for avoiding the issue in interviews, saying he did not think ‘discussing’ gender issues ‘helps anyone in the long-run’. 

He still cannot come out and say it, the truth that is. He can’t say ‘women do not have penises’. He has to wriggle and qualify it.

I heard it once said that if a person has no music or appreciation of music in their soul then they are a person fit only for cynicism, stratagems and ruses. If that is the case how much worse in terms of suitability for high office would be a person who cannot even state the observable and provable truth that women do not possess penises.

4 Comments on "Sir Beers still wrestling with the hard penis issue."

  1. I’m interested in how the music reference has come up. Keir Starmer was a junior exhibitioner at the Guildhall School of Music and Drama in London. This was a scheme whereby teenagers who had become proficient in the playing of a musical instrument, or maybe two, were given free Saturday morning classes to develop their musicianship.

    • Fahrenheit211 | June 9, 2022 at 6:15 pm |

      That reference is there to highlight that just as someone who has no music or appreciation of music in their inner world which makes them suitable for only negative things and therefore untrustworthy and unacceptable as a leader, to fail to be able to say ‘a woman is an adult human female’ also makes that person untrustworthy and unacceptably unreliable.

Comments are closed.