Over the years I’ve observed many court cases either in person or via media reports and therefore I’ve heard countless examples of statements by defendants or mitigation by defence counsel and solicitors. Some of these mitigations and defendant statements have had a good basis in reality and have been used in cases where there was, due to the defendant’s background, history or circumstances, solid grounds for mercy by the judge or magistrate. However there have been others where the crime was so horrific and the criminal so morally odious that no mitigation or pleas for mercy by the defendant are justifiable.

A good example of the latter, a criminal and a crime so odious that no mitigation or excuse could possibly apply, comes from the deportation hearing for one of the Muslim nonces who carried out a raft of rape and sexual and other physical assaults on girls as young as 13, as part of his activities with the Rochdale Islamic Rape Gang. Adil Khan aged 51, was convicted of various sex offences, including the rape and impregnation of a girl of 13 back in 2012. Astonishingly he was released from prison far too early in the views of many, a view that I share, but was recommended for deportation back to Pakistan. However in an effort to fight his deportation Khan is claiming that he needs to stay in the UK as he would not be accepted back in Pakistan due to the crimes he’s committed and, get this for chutzpah, Khan said that he needed to be in Britain in order to be a role model for his son.

What the actual hell! A child rapist, for that is what Khan truly is, is the very last person who should be considered as a role model for any child or young person. Whilst anybody is entitled to due legal process, even scum like this, I can’t help but feeling that Khan, who has been in Britain for years but still needed an interpreter in order to speak to the Court, is really taking the piss with this woeful excuse for a reason not to be deported back to the shithole that he came from.

Sky News said:

In Khan’s final hearing on Wednesday, the judge asked how his son would be affected if he was sent back to Pakistan.

He said through an interpreter: “As you know, the father figure is very important in every culture in the world, to be a role model for the child, to tell him or her right from wrong.”

He added that his family didn’t want him back because his infamy would be bad for their business.

Khan’s abuse included getting a 13-year-old pregnant and using the threat of violence to pass a 15-year-old around to other men.

Personally I cannot care one iota for his family’s worries about what Khan’s presence in Pakistan will do for their business there, that’s a matter for them not us in Britain. Neither do I care much for any concerns for Khan’s ‘human rights’ as he’s been proven, fairly and in open court, to be an inhuman savage because of the way that he’s treated his victims. As far as I’m concerned he’s forfeited such rights by his behaviour. He has grossly trampled on the human rights of others such as the human right not to be raped and therefore cannot and should not expect his own rights to be respected. His excuse that it would be bad for his son for him to be deported to Pakistan is an utterly laughable one as I fail to see what benefit being around a child rapist would accrue to his son.

Khan is plainly not suitable to live in a civilised country, this has been proven by both his behaviour and his conviction in a court that is a thousand times more fair than the courts in Pakistan. He needs to be gone and it will be something extremely unjust if the court decides that this unwanted scumbag is allowed to continue to reside and be an ongoing problem for the people of the United Kingdom. ‘Role model’ my arse. This scumbag is not so much a role model but more a cautionary tale about how NOT to live ones life.