The alt-media personality Stew Peters and wearer of an even stranger style of tin foil hat than sported by Alex Jones, calls himself ‘The People’s Bullhorn’. Unfortunately on the subject of his knowledge of radio frequency devices and the spectrum that they work on, Stew Peters clearly is much more like ‘The People’s Bullcrap Horn.’
On 2nd February of this year Mr Peter’s put out a Tweet obliquely calling for criminal damage against 5G cellular radio towers.
Mr Peters said:
The replies from this post made for interesting reading, as although there were some individuals, with obvious experience or familiarity with, physics, radio and electronics, willing to put Stew Peters and his followers right about their misconceptions about the effects of the electromagnetic spectrum, there were many more commentators who must have dropped physics at school just after they had got to the Ladybird First Book of Electricity (simplified edition) stage.
The thread is absolutely fascinating due to the extreme levels of physics ignorance on display. One contributor thought it suspicious that the 5G towers are relatively close together even though this phenomenon is very easy to understand once you realise that the higher the frequency you go, the less distance the radio wave will travel. At the sort of Ultra High and Super High Frequencies the wave will really only travel line of sight and does not bounce off of the Ionosphere and travel further as is the case with the High Frequencies which go from 3 – 30 MHz. Also at these much higher frequencies the wave can be attenuated or blocked by dust or water vapour and much else. The properties of the wave determine the distance between cell station towers which is why the stations at 5G need to be close together.
Yet another ignoramus was claiming that SHF radio waves harmed the health and ‘caused red blood cells to clump together’. This is obviously an individual who does not know or can’t be arsed to find out the difference between ionising radiation and non-ionising radiation. If you don’t understand that ionising radiation is the nasty bugger that comes from the explosion of a nuclear weapon or from a badly maintained nuclear power station or from a medical source like Cobalt 60 and that non-ionising radiation is relatively harmless at low power levels, then you have so little physics knowledge that you can’t be taken seriously on the subject of physics or radio. Mind you if you are quoting approvingly, as this poster did in order to make their point, from pseudoscience guff salesman Del Bigtree, a man who promoted avoidance of the measles vaccine to culturally isolated Haredi Jews in the middle of a measles outbreak, an outbreak partially caused by low levels of vaccination, then you can’t be taken seriously on any scientific matter.
Another contributor, also someone who may have skipped school on the day that basic physics was taught, claimed that it was not the cell towers that were the problem but the 5G phones themselves. This poster claimed that the phones were mini microwave ovens designed to afflict the user. Whilst some 5G devices do use frequencies that are up in the higher sections of the microwave part of the spectrum, the power levels put out by phones in the current 900 and 1800 MHz bands are much lower than microwave ovens, often 2 watts on the higher level for 900 megs and down in the sub 500 milliwatt at the lower level for 1800MHz and therefore have much less energy than the power levels in a microwave oven. Yes RF can be dangerous but that only applies when the power is high and a person is extremely close to the transmitting antenna. Newton’s Inverse Square Law applies here which says that the further away from an antenna you are then the less RF you will receive. It’s why TV broadcasters run on reduced power when there are antenna riggers working on a transmitter tower and who will therefore be unusually close to the active TV transmitting antenna, in order to reduce the exposure to damaging RF power levels that the workers might be exposed to. It’s pretty obvious that this contributor knows the square root of sod all about both radio and the effect on RF on the human body.
What Peters and his acolytes don’t know or understand when it comes to physics and the electromagnetic spectrum is absolutely astonishing. He and his followers are so ignorant of basic and incontrovertible facts that it is completely gobsmacking. Now I might have some advantage in talking about this sort of thing because I have have had a lifelong interest in radio and hold a basic entry level radio licence, But what Peters and his fan club are failing to get to grips with regarding radio is not anything scientifically esoteric or that which would be out of the average person’s expected knowledge, such as Tropospheric Tunnelling for example, but stuff that is basic school physics of the type that I was taught in the early years of secondary school.
The sort of radio waves that 5G and other current and future mobile phone systems operate or will operate on, are not ‘killer waves’, the tech specs of the systems and the physics of radio completely disprove that. Whilst I accept there are privacy implications involved when there are a vast number of wirelessly connected devices ranging from fridges to mobile computers being hooked up together, but that’s a political rather than scientific matter, the actual waves themselves are nothing at all to worry about. A lot of the nasties on the radio frequency spectrum such as ultra violet, gamma rays, X rays and cosmic rays start right up above the area where light is and at around 30 Petahertz in the middle of the Ultra Violet sector. This is a long long way away from mobile phone frequencies. Yes there will be some use of the higher parts of the microwave spectrum in the 3 to 30GHz range but some of the 5G phones are even in that part of the spectrum vacated by broadcasters following the shift to digital TV broadcasting in the 470 to 800MHz bands and we’ve been living surrounded by such frequency emissions for decades with very little if any ill effect on humans.
Stew Peters knows nothing at all about how the electromagnetic spectrum works or how it affects or doesn’t affect the human body and his followers obviously know even less. It’s amazing how Stew Peters can be so wrong so consistently about things that are based in basic practical physics of the sort that nearly everyone interacts with every day whether that be by tuning a radio to Radio Four longwave, answering a mobile phone call or watching over the air broadcast television. If Peters can be so absolutely and provably wrong on something as basic and as fundamental as the nature of the RF spectrum then how on earth can anybody trust him and his site on anything else? Stew Peters and his followers have proven to me that they are an example of how a self starting moron can gather followers who are even more moronic than he is.
To conclude: I don’t want to see the likes of Stew Peters or his followers to be unable to speak the contents of what little brains they might possess and to disappear from general view, that’s not the point of my criticisms of him and his output. On the contrary I want to see him and his pals out in the open as it gives me something to laugh at when I need to laugh and in any event it is better that such idiocy is on display where it can be challenged rather than festering away in the shadows. It is preferable that Peters and the shipload of fools who are his supporters can be openly mocked for their foolishness, rather than have them in echo chambers where Peters could, unchallenged, continue to vacuum up the attention and the money of the mad and the gullible and possibly transmogrifying into something worse or more radically divorced from reality than he and his acolytes already are.
These waves are slightly different to ‘normal’ radio waves, such as AM & FM, as they are packet-switched. I don’t know of any long-term studies showing the potential interactions of these with human tissue.
However, there are documented cases of some people having alleged sensitivities to certain RF (which I think were confirmed by double-blind experimentation). So I agree 99% with you, with slight concerns…my Uni physics was long before packet radio, so I’m rather ignorant.
I’ve had a quick dig about RF exposure and although there have been claims of damage from RF but according to the IEEE there’s no mechanism that has been found to back these claims up.
We’ve had packet radio of various sorts as far as I can make out since the seventies with no convincing reports that packet switched signals are a problem. If the matter relates to pulsed transmissions then that would also include Morse / CW where the TX is switched on and off. With all the CW that has been flying around since the early 20th century then surely some negative effect of these pulsed transmissions would have been noted.
On exposure the IEEE said:
Following their reviews of the scientific literature, most committees concluded that the most
sensitive reproducible effect is the disruption of learned behavior in trained laboratory animals.
This effect, which has been observed in several species of animals and under various RF
exposure conditions, occurs at a whole-body SAR of about 4 W/kg. This RF energy absorption
rate, which is associated with an increase in body temperature, stimulates the animal to stop
performing a complex learned task. Such behavioral change is reversible and not considered
harmful to the animal. The assumption is made, although not yet tested, that exposures at this
level (same whole body SAR) would have comparable effects in humans. At considerably higher
levels of exposure, thermal stress can occur that is similar to that produced by excessively hot
environments or strenuous exercise.Despite a considerable amount of speculation in the scientific
literature, no mechanism has been established by which electromagnetic fields at levels below
recommended limits can produce biological damage of clinical consequence[6].
https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/embs/comar/phone.pdf
Testing RF on animals in a controlled environment where the subject is constantly exposed for a long period of time to enough RF at 4W/kg is a much greater exposure than you’d get from a phone base station on the top of a mast or using a phone in the normal manner. If my rough calculations are correct somene of my weight would need to stand next to antennas kicking out nearly 400W of continuous RF for a considerable length of time, something that is not a real life scenario. There is a lot of caution in the world of radio manufacturing so much so that when I bought some semi pro hand held 446 radios a few years back it came with a warning not to hit the PTT button if the antenna is in a body orifice which made me wonder ‘what sort of Darwin award contender sticks a live transmitting antenna into their ear, mouth or anus? ‘
I remember back in the very early eighties ,the fuss about a mobile phone mast being erected near to an Infant school.The mast has been in place for 40 years and there is not one hint of any injury. A lot of the people complaining had mobile phones.
Yep. I can well believe that. It’s like they could not mentally connect the phone in their hand with the repeater station they were unnecessarily concerned about. Agree with you in that we have had decades of real world experience with RF at the higher end of the spectrum such as that used by phones, wifi, radar, TV, satellite broadcasting and its very powerful uplinks, beacons, radio hams with a higher level of licence than me, drone controllers, emergency service and military datacomms, GPS, UHF TV etc etc. None of this has harmed people physically. The powers used and the distance that the antennas are placed from people right up high on masts preclude danger to humans. What is dangerous is deliberately sticking your head in a microwave transmission horn when it is operating, but then you would need to be far more ignorant than some of Stew Peters followers in order to do that. We’ve known that was a bad idea since the guy who discovered that microwaves could heat stuff up realised back in the early 50’s I believe that it was the waves from the experimental microwave set up he was using that was melting the chocolate bar in the pocket of his jacket.
Well you can hardly expect the general public to understand these things. That is why we have experts to analyse and explain but wait. These are the same experts that enabled political scumbags to push us to have covid jabs that are killing us and force us to destroy our future and way of life chasing carbon targets.
No wonder people don’t believe what they are told and don’t trust experts. Experts have destroyed the trust we have in them. We just don’t believe them any more.
I disagree with your claim that the vaccines are killing people, I’ve not seen enough convincing evidence from sources which I can trust that this is a major issue. Stew Peters has claimed that this is happening and has claimed that covid vaccines are causing an uptick in number of blood clots. This claim, made in ‘Died Suddenly’ a film made by Peters, has been thoroughly busted by an embalming expert who has seen post mortem blood clots for decades and says they are pretty normal. See: https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/a-clot-too-far-an-embalmer-dissects-antivax-misinformation-about-blood-clots-in-died-suddenly/
I certainly agree that the Green cult has some worrying aspects to it. Whenever I’ve dug into it I find that once you scratch the surface of green ideology it starts to look an awful lot like some of the authoritarianisms that the world suffered from in the 20th century. The disgust at humanity and a distrust of the broader mass of it that all too many exponents of green ideology seem to have is something that Pol Pot might have recognised.
I certainly agree that the last few years has seen a proliferation of experts who ended up being proven wrong, especially over stuff like the effectiveness of lockdowns. What’s needed is a better and more honest class of experts.
I do concur with you in saying that people will look elsewhere for information when they realise that some experts that are promoted in the MSM are just political hacks and not independent at all. The question is to what alternative source do you go to? Not all sources are either good, accurate or trustworthy. What I do is this: If the source promotes stuff that I know is bollocks such as 5G mind control shit, or flat earthery, or chemtrails or a link between autism and MMR vaccines, or if the source speaks approvingly of people like Del Bigtree, then I’ve got a pretty good idea about what I’m dealing with and it would make me less likely to trust that source even if the one article I’m reading on it is not particularly mental. When a site, like Stew Peters one, gets such basic stuff wrong about radio then it’s highly likely, if not probable, that the rest of his output, including ‘Died Suddenly’ is also wrong.