Pictured is not a proper police officer……

 

…….he is instead merely a cowering cowardly cuck in police uniform.

Like many others I am livid at the appeasing and cowardly response by a school in Wakefield, by the local authority there and by West Yorkshire police to an incident where a teenage autistic child was subjected to death threats by Muslims after he was accused by Muslim activists of damaging a Koran.

This story, which has not just gone around the world rapidly, but has also exposed again to public view just how far our Police forces will go in order to appease Muslims and Islamic sensibilities and how the police give a free pass to Islam derived threats of violence.

For those few who are unfamiliar with the story Spiked has probably some of the best coverage of it but to précis it, this has been the timeline. Autistic boy playing video games with friends loses a game and the friends decided that the boy has to come up with a forfeit. The forfeit that fell to the boy was to bring a copy of the Koran to school. The boy was later messing around with his friends and the Koran fell to the ground and got ‘scuffed’. The scuffing of the Koran was quite accidental but even if it wasn’t it should not be an issue either for the police nor anybody else as it was the boy’s own Koran not one stolen from someone else. It was his own personal property and therefore should be able to do what he wanted with it.

The scuffing brought out the usual and sadly as expected death threats aimed the boy from local followers of the woefully misnamed ‘Religion of Peace’. The headteacher of the school, the local council and the police then showed how little the rest of us can rely on them, when they basically threw the autistic boy under the proverbial bus. These people and entities appeased the violent Muslims issuing death threats and took no action against them. This is two tier government, administration and policing in full and clear view.

This is how Spiked has reported this latest incident of police and others cowering and abasing themselves towards religious extremists and bigots.

Tom Slater the Editor of Spiked said:

Welcome to Britain in 2023, where blasphemous teens are menaced while our not-so-liberal elites look the other way.

Here’s what happened, according to a local imam, a Wakefield councillor, the school’s headteacher and a policeman. All of whom addressed a meeting at the local mosque on Friday night, and all of whom should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves. Last Wednesday, a student (who happens to be autistic) reportedly brought a copy of the Koran into school on a dare – his forfeit for losing a game of Call of Duty with his mates. On the school tennis court, they read aloud from it then walked back inside the school, where another kid knocked it out of their hands and on to the floor. For this, the four students were suspended, following a quick investigation. The police – naturally – were then called in. At the meeting on Friday, a policeman, introduced as chief inspector Andy Thornton, confirmed that the students’ treatment of the book has been recorded as a ‘hate incident’. This is despite the fact that the school has ruled that the students had ‘no malicious intent’. ‘[I]f more consequences have to be followed, that will be the case’, Tudor Griffiths, the school’s headteacher, told those gathered at the mosque – keen to reassure them that he took the issue seriously.

Unbelievably, it gets worse. While rumours swirled that the book had been burnt and spat on – in truth, it was barely damaged – the autistic boy at the centre of it all began to receive death threats. Yes, death threats – which, unlike disrespecting holy books, are actually (and legitimately) a criminal matter in the United Kingdom. But the students who issued these threats are off the hook. Akef Akbar, a councillor for Wakefield East, made this clear at the Friday meeting, sat next to the mother of the autistic student. ‘To her credit’, Akbar said, ‘she understands the situation and has advised the police that she does not want any of these children [who sent threats to her son] to be prosecuted, and she only asks that her son is not harmed’.

Mr Slater is correct in his assessment of the situation in that making credible threats to kill is a serious crime and one that, in this case, should have seen charges landing in the hands of those who have made the death threats, providing that they are of course over the age of criminal responsibility. However that’s not what happened. The police basically let the serious offence of threatening to kill go by uninvestigated and alleged criminals face no sanction.

They did this I believe to not upset the Muslims, because in Britain today it seems that for many police forces cowering and cucking before Islamic grievance mongers and their veiled and sometimes not so veiled threats of violence and disorder, appears to take priority over everything else. In short the law, especially the law that says that threatening to kill is forbidden, was let down by those in the police that we told to trust to enforce it . Officers such as Chief Inspector Andy ‘cowardly cuck’ Thornton, who is I believe pictured above, chose the the course of appeasement of Islamic political and religious interests over protecting the rights of vulnerable Britons like the autistic boy at the centre of this disgraceful story.

Mr Slater then went on to comment on the disgusting move by those in authority to force or coerce the mother of the boy to abase herself in front of an audience in a mosque, which involved pleading, to the local Muslims, for the safety of her son, like some Dhimmified second class citizen Christian or Jew, living precarious lives in some of the more nasty places in the Islamic world, places like the Pakistan of today and other Islamic lands prior to quite recent times. Mr Slater said:

This is chilling. This mother was effectively begging for her son’s safety, while the school and police were apparently more concerned about protecting religious bigots’ hurt feelings. Indeed, the response of the school and police runs the risk of contributing to the threat posed to these boys. By suspending those students and logging their behaviour as a ‘hate incident’, the school and police are effectively saying that the mob has a point – that the boys should be punished for ‘disrespecting’ Islam’s holy book.

It is indeed chilling that a British mother, no matter what skin colour that mother be, should have to beg for her child’s safety from potentially violent religious bigots. It speaks volumes that the police decided that appeasing the sort of Muslims who make death threats to kids was much more important that protecting someone who had done nothing wrong. Outside the Old Bailey court in London are the words ‘Defend the children of the poor and punish the wrongdoer’. West Yorkshire police have, by helping to monster this boy and not go after his persecutors, clearly failed to live up to that admirable standard of justice.

This is a watershed moment for both the police and the public’s view of and trust for the police. Their involvement in the Wakefield Scandal (and yes indeed it is a scandal) is especially noteworthy. It’s that way because in this case we’ve seen police openly ignore a crime, that of threat to kill in order to appease and pander to a mob of Muslims. As well as this act of appeasement being morally wrong in and of itself, it sends a terrible message to non-Muslims. Chief Inspector Andy ‘Cuck’ Thornton’s decision to sit there in a mosque and take part in what is essentially a form of ‘auto de fe’ in which the boy’s family are forced to apologise for their ‘heresy’ and ‘blasphemy’, shows us whose side he and his force is on. Hint, It doesn’t seem to be the area’s non-Muslim population.

A lot of non-Muslims, not just in the West Yorkshire area might start to look at this scandal and wonder whether, if the chips were down and they or a family member were being targeted by Muslim criminals, the police would come down on the side of the Muslim aggressors or the non-Muslim victims? Going by CI ‘Cuck’ Thornton’s performance if I was a non-Muslim living in an area that he and his force policed then I’d feel somewhat forced, due in large part to the actions of Thornton et al, to have very little confidence that the police would be there for me.

Would those non-Muslims being policed by the likes of Chief Inspector Cuck Thornton have any confidence that if they reported a Muslim burglar, robber, rapist or religious thug to his force that any action would be taken against the alleged criminals? I don’t believe that they would be able to have confidence in the police. They would probably see West Yorkshire police’s abject capitulation to an Islamic mob in Wakefield and work out that in such a situation the police would not support them or defend them from attack or criminality if the perpetrators were Muslim.

The actions of CI Thornton and his force are disgraceful and indeed dangerous. His force has shown clearly and publicly that they will take more seriously claims by Muslims, even when these claims are bullshit and based on bullshit reasoning such as ‘blasphemy against Islam’, than they would crimes aimed at members of the non-Muslim community by Muslims. This is disgraceful and is bent policing of the worst kind. It’s also extremely dangerous as by caving into an Islamic mob, legitimising them by doing nothing about those Muslims making death threats and abandoning non-Muslims such as the boy at the centre of this scandal to potential Islamic aggression, might end up encouraging the growth of non-Muslim mobs. These could ostensibly form as a defensive response to being abandoned by police forces obsessed with ‘diversity’ and appeasement. For the record I don’t want to see the growth of mobs whether they be Islamic religious ones nor defensive mobs of non-Muslims. What I want to see is honest, impartial and effective policing that everyone can rely on no matter what their race or faith. Unfortunately that is not what the people of West Yorkshire are currently getting from their police force.

All the agencies involved in this sorry tale but especially the police should have been robust. They should have ignored the whines of Islamic radicals and said that this Koran was the boy’s own personal property and he could do what he damned well liked with it and come down hard on any Muslim that kicked off violently over it. They didn’t do that. They appeased and let off those who dished out death threats. Therefore West Yorkshire Police and any officer who kow towed to the death threat makers and their supporters is in my view unfit to police their area.

Addendum:

There is a great deal of anger about the actions of West Yorkshire Police in this matter among the denizens of social media. Patrick O’Flynn the political commentator has been retweeting comment about this scandal and there’s been a politics lecturer who has revealed more about allegations that local Muslims are escalating the tensions about this case.

Another interesting snippet of information is from an account that I’m not personally very familiar with but which contains an alleged screenshot of a Tweet from a Muslim Labour councillor called Usman Ali who it is claimed to have said to have called the Koran scuffing ‘a grave provocation’ in words that some might see as undue pressure on the local police. I’ve posted this alleged screenshot below so people can see it but commentators to this account are stating that this Usman Ali character deleted the screenshotted Tweet when it became more widely known. I don’t at this time know if the screenshot is genuine and this is something to be determined but there doesn’t seem to be any mention of the Koran scuffing on Cllr Ali’s current Twitter feed with no new posts on it since February 26th of this year. This could mean that either the screenshot is bogus or this councillor has scrubbed his feed because this case has become a very live and extremely hot button issue. There needs to be further investigation as the provenance and veracity of the screenshot but there’s more conversation about it here.

Cllr Ali is getting an awful lot of criticism for his alleged comments on the Koran scuffing incident that can be found on this thread. The excellent commentator Habibi who is a regular at the well known and well respected centre left blog Harry’s Place, has also commented on this matter. See Here I’d also like to recommend that people read the ex-Muslim Yasmine Mohammed’s comments on this case which are both interesting and relevant via this link

8 Comments on "Pictured is not a proper police officer……"

  1. The book wasn’t “desecrated”, and Usman Ali’s words regarding “terrible provocation” and “community relations” are essentially a threat of violence against the non-muslim population.

    • Fahrenheit211 | March 2, 2023 at 12:38 pm |

      On the veracity of the Usman Ali Tweet, Brendan O’Neil in the Speccy is calling this as correct and true. There’s also something suspect in how Ali appeared to scrub his Twitter feed of references to the Qurangate stuff until others forced it back into his timelime. I agree that there is a lot in Ali’s Tweet (later deleted interestingly) that could reasonably be seen as a threat of at best non cooperation with the authorities and at worst violence. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/qurangate-and-britains-new-blasphemy-rules/

  2. This is my home city.The black cloud of islam is spreading across it aided and abetted by useful idiots.We are heading down the same road as Dewsbury which was written about by Danny Lockwood in his book The Islamic Republic Of Dewsbury.

    • Fahrenheit211 | March 2, 2023 at 2:28 pm |

      I agree that the useful idiots, like Chief Inspector ‘Cuck’ and the school leadership do a very great deal to help the power of some of the worst forms of Islam in the country. There’s a lot of scuttlebutt going around about the mosque that’s behind this incident. One such snippet alleges that the mosque is unembarrassed about Koranic texts about stoning people https://twitter.com/emily8275/status/1630988037524971520/photo/1

      • I suppose it depends what you mean by the “… worst forms of Islam…”. If you mean from the perspective of non-Muslims (the “filthy disbelievers” as the Koran calls us) then you are right of course.
        But from the Islamic point of view it is arguable that those are the best forms of Islam and they are certainly the orthodox forms of Islam if we consider the actions of the early and thus most “authentic” Muslims.

        I wonder what the mosques official view about the murder of, termed death penalty for, of those who “blaspheme” against “Allah, his prophet, his religion or his book [Koran]” to quote a Hadith?

  3. A real irony here – further evidence IMO of Ali’s deliberate attempt to stir up anti-white religious hatred, for which he should be prosecuted (but won’t be) – is that the Koran in question is an English interpretation.

    Muslims will tell you that only the Arabic Koran is really the Koran, all translations are merely “interpretations”, so what we might term an “interpreted Koran” or “fake Koran” was involved here.
    Perhaps the term “fake koran” is too strong, but knowing the liberties many interpreters take with the meanings of the text to make it more palatable for non-Muslims, I’m actually not sure about that.

    So, if the book involved wasn’t a REAL koran, why the fuss?
    My answer is so that Muslims could once again prove their (Allah given) domination of W.Yorkshire, its schools, Police etc., knowing that (as you wrote F211) all these would grovel to them and force that poor woman to beg for her son’s safety.
    This reminds me of the sort of thing that happens all the time in the Muslim World when allegations of “blasphemy” are made against Kaffirs, the kaffirs – usually blameless – have to beg the Muslim community for forgiveness and often pay crippling “reparations”.
    I’m now waiting for the mosque of Ali (or someone else) to suggest that perhaps this lad’s family might care to pay them reparations for the “hurt” they have received.

  4. Siddi Nasrani | March 3, 2023 at 7:45 pm |

    How do think they gain control of country’s? From Arabia the birth place of Islam they set out to conquer the world by violence, as of now there are 49 Islamic States & expanding.
    Where as, Christianity spend around the world by Peace & Love via the New Testament of
    Christianity.

  5. @Siddi Nasrani:
    Quite agree, but don’t downplay the roles of “jihad of the hand” and “jihad of the tongue/pen” either. Both are widely used in the West to gain special status for Islam (no criticism of Islam, time off work for prayer 3 times a day, halalisation of the food trade, etc. etc.).
    In fact those non-violent forms of Jihad (though hand jihad can come with the threat of violence, as we have seen in this case) have gained Muslims more in the west than has out-and-out sword-jihad (jihad bis saif), currently at the “terror attack” stage, though again those are keeping people aware of the ever-present threat of Islamic violence (either mob – e.g. Leicester riots – or terrorist), thus promoting the the “You mustn’t upset the Muslims” meme and trope that West Yorks Police force seem to enforce with almost fanatical zeal.

    @F211:
    Thanks for the update.
    I can’t pretend to be surprised that the Labour Councillors are doing this.(One would hope that they would be thrown out of the Labour party for their clear incitement to violence, but we all know that won’t happen.)
    The hypocrisy of Akef Akbar is breathtaking (or would be if this were not a constant with some Muslim “leaders”), playing “conciliator” and “moderate” to the public whilst stoking the fires or intolerance and grievance to fellow Muslims. Taqqiya at its finest.
    Usman Ali is at least honest about his orthodoxy and intolerance and I actually prefer that. At least we know his true views.

Comments are closed.