Many will be familiar with the case of Aimee/Ashton Challoner the loony troon with the extremely noncey father who employed said father as his election agent whilst campaigning for the Green Party. This was a woeful abandonment of any concepts of safeguarding by the Greens who should have done some form of due diligence enquiry into Challoner senior when he was appointed as Challoner junior’s election agent and maybe even on Challoner junior himself.
Now, according to Graham Linehan, the Greens in Scotland are showing some more signs that they don’t take noncery seriously.
Readers may recall the case of Katie (originally Lennon) Dolatowski who is a violent paedophile who has convictions for sexual assault of an underage girl in a public toilet and for filming a twelve year old girl in another public toilet. Dolatowski also is said to have a ‘lengthy’ record for other offences.
Dolatowski has, Mr Linehan said, reinvented himself as Alyanna McKenna and in this guise has attracted the support of some of the loony troons that have immense influence in the Scottish Green Party. Green types are following Dolatowski/McKenna and not only seeing nothing wrong in doing this but worse seeing an association with this person as a good thing.
Mr Linehan said:
Perhaps the most predictable follower is transgender Francis Foster-in-a-wig lookalike Green Party parliamentary candidate, Heather Herbert.
Herbert, is a former Labour Party candidate for both the British and Scottish parliaments and trans officer for LGBT+ Labour Scotland, who’s now a Green Party politician and candidate for Aberdeen, who, as he says on his website, was elected along with ‘Beth’ Douglas. (Douglas, like Aimee Challenor, is a young man who says he ‘identifies’ as a woman, and was hailed by the Green Party before becoming embroiled in sexual abuse scandals.)
He’s tweeted that one of his “biggest accomplishments” has been to get Dolatowski/ McKenna to follow him on Twitter.
If Britain’s Green parties want to be known as supporters of horrible nonces such as Dolatowski as well as being morally relaxed about Britons starving and freezing to death because of an over-reliance on unreliable renewables, then they are going the right way about it. Somehow however I don’t believe that ‘vote for us we like nonces’ will be the winning hand that the Greens might think it is.
Yes, but no political parties are exempt from noncery among their ranks and we tend to castigate or excuse them according to our political leanings. Sad fact.
To take another issue, I note you are promoting ‘Alf Up a Tree’ and you appear to have donè limited research into his background and what wider political interests he might represent. Alf’s real leanings may be among PA supporters for instance. We really don’t know.
I completely agree that noncery can be found in all political parties, however parties like the Greens and the Lib Dems that have wholeheartedly embraced the cult of trans have also opened themselves up to their parties becoming attractive prospects for extremists and predators. When you get a situation where parties might not want to look too closely at some of their trans supporters or allies, because of a fear of being seen to be ‘transphobic’, then it becomes more easy for predators, extremists and exploiters to slip in with less than rigid scrutiny.
As regards Alf, yes he could be PA but from what I saw on his channel more likely not. I make this judgement from his assessment of the Hearts of Oak group who were present at a let women speak demo. Alf definitely seemed to me to be someone wary of genuine fascists and neo-Nazis. I could be wrong of course but I get the impression that Alf is centrist /centre left/ old non identiarian Left
Yes, but the feminist trans exclusionary Womens Place UK for instance as probable centrists/centre leftists have deplatformed and distanced themselves from Posie Parker because they think she is also a bit racist and homophobic. It therefore appears a bit odd for Alf to be supporting her if he’s centre left.
Also, although he appears resonable so many anomalies keep appearing in my thoughts. For instance he refers to Posie as only selling a few T Shirts as opposed to Sophie’s grifting. But Standing for Women has a vast paid up membership structure ranging from £500 for Life through various increments from £250 a year to the cheapest at £5 a month, plus begs for her overseas tours.
I cannot regard him as entirely trustworthy to have ignored this so one-sidedly.
There is a noticeable split in opinions in the gender critical movement but then you find the same in any political movement. Re Posie Parker I believe from what I can gather that WP might be unhappy with PP’s style of activism with the in your face street protests. What I will say is that PP is far more willing to speak to those with a diverse range of opinions than maybe some gc feminists are happy with and I believe that this is a good thing as it gets the message out to a wider audience and allows PP to promote her views to a wider group of people. I’ve seen no evidence that PP is racist of homophobic and the bulk of homophobia in the trans/GC conflict is coming from the trans side some of whom are quite happy to describe LBG people as ‘genital fetishists’.
It’s possible to support a person who is working for a cause one agrees with but disagree with other aspects of that person’s views. To give an analogy, it’s quite possible and indeed reasonable to be centre left with regards economics whilst centre right or right socially.
Standing For Women is a much bigger deal with much bigger expenses than Sophie. SFW have to pay for lawyers, transport, lots of security and other onerous expenses. Sophie on the other hand is seemingly only spending the money on himself and not being exactly transparent about what the money that he constantly appeals for is spent on. I can get a rough idea, helped by sitting on the management committees of a few community groups, of what SFW is spending its money on, I can’t do the same with this Sophie character.
No commentator is entirely trustworthy but some are slightly more trustworthy than others.
To add: For the record Standing for Women is not ‘trans exclusionary’, they are dedicated to keeping women’s spaces for women.
I’ve gone and looked at PP’s Twitter feed and I can find no over homophobia nor racism but plenty of pro woman stuff, plenty of stuff criticising the gender cult and a fair bit where PP shows she’s on the side of free speech, even the speech which Ms Parker might personally disagree with.
*reasonable