The general pattern of events that plays out following either a Jihad attack with mass casualties or an attack like that in Nottingham where the motive of the murderer is not yet known but which was carried out by a man who should never have been kept in the UK, is now in motion. Following the Nottingham attacks we’ve again been treated to the large public rallies where people can express their grief at yet another preventable horror, light candles, make speeches about peace and diversity and have memorials dominated by national and local Establishment types saying ‘let’s not look back in anger’.

We’ve become all too used to such memorials following terrorist or migrant-caused atrocities. We saw this after the London Bridge I and II attacks, after the Westminster attack and after the Manchester attack. It is almost as if there is some sort of script being played out in these situations. A script that dictates that those who are grief-stricken by an incident resulting in senseless killings are brought together and have their grief massaged in public and encouraged to be openly expressed, possibly in order to stop those people affected by the attack becoming rightfully and righteously angry at what has gone on and continues to go on, regarding stuff like Islamic extremism and migrant related crime in Britain.

It’s only later in most cases, when the lightning-like justifiable public anger after an attack has been earthed and transformed in to the more politically acceptable emotion of grief and an ingredient in the recipe for media mawkishness, that we start to find out just how badly the State and liberal/left entities and organisations have cocked up. We also often find out just how it was possible that these cock ups by government agencies and the results of liberal propaganda, have ended in tragedy for Britons.

After the 2019 London Bridge II attack, at a point when the memorial candles had long burned away, we found out that HM Prisons and an applauded, by liberals in low crime areas probably, rehabilitation project, were incredibly naive about an Islamic extremist that they either had in their custody or worked with. It didn’t seem to enter the heads of anybody handling this violent savage that he would lie in order to get out onto the streets and cause murderous havoc, which as we all know, he did. The criminal justice system when trying him for previous Islamic terror related offences related to a plot to bomb the London Stock Exchange, also underestimated the danger that this savage posed and both did not gaol him for a long enough time but also automatically released him after half his 16 year sentence had been served.

Following the 2017 London Bridge I attack in which eight people, mostly innocent visitors to London, were killed in an Islamic vehicular homicide and stabbing attack on the South side of London Bridge we saw similar actions by the State to stop justifiable anger at the attack leading to any sort of meaningful change. In the aftermath of this particular horror, which followed so closely from the Islamic atrocity at Manchester Arena, that occurred just over a month prior to this attack, we saw the Prime Minister Theresa May showing either her utter ignorance of Islam or wishful thinking about this ideology. The Prime Minister said that the attacks were a ‘perversion of Islam’. She was wrong there. Attacking the ‘infidel’ has always been a part of Islamic theology but thankfully most Muslims don’t seem to want to engage with that part of their ideology. It’s there, so it’s not a perversion, it’s just something that most Muslims have given up, just as Jews have given up on the idea of stoning adulterers. That sort of thing might have been acceptable in the early Iron Ages when the Israelites became a bigger tribe than they were but not today, the instruction to stone adulterers is still there, just ignored as not a thing any more. The average ‘Joe Mohammed-from-the-tyre-shop’ in Birmingham is I believe as unlikely to be a terrorist and kill non Muslims as ‘Rabbi Cohen’ from modern day north west London is to stone his cheating wife. However, Theresa May’s deployment of at best wishful thinking about Islam did not encourage confidence in any belief that the Government knew what they were doing when it came to Islamic extremism.

Also what emerged in the aftermath of the London Bridge I attack was that one of the Islamic murderers was known to be an extremist head case. He lived in Plaistow in the London Borough of Newham, a borough that is nearly entirely beholden to Islamic interests in the local Labour Party and was a member of the same Islamic extremist group that the murderers of Lee Rigby belonged to. However what came out in addition was the the police did not do nearly enough to stop this particular savage becoming a problem. The Metropolitan Police knew that this savage was well connected with other similar savages and it has been alleged that his neighbours knew that he had been reported to the police for trying to radicalise children.

We did not find out this information about the Met’s failure to take this savage seriously until after the now ubiquitous public memorials to the dead in this mass murder had subsided and the candle stubs and wilting flowers laid by grieving relatives and members of the public had been cleared away. We should have been angry at the unnecessary and brutal deaths caused by these jihadist savages and angry that yet again we have not been protected from them, but instead we were encouraged by our Establishment to cry.

In 2017 a little over a month before the London Bridge I attack, we had the Manchester Arena Bombing. This atrocity was caused by a Libyan Muslim extremist, a man from an entire family of similar extremists, who were allowed into the United Kingdom as ‘refugees’.

This imported and wholly unwanted savage killed 22 people in a bomb attack, many of them young people, just as a concert by the singer Ariana Grande was ending. Following the attack we had another example of how the State manages the aftermath of Islamic and other similar atrocities. We had the vigils, the mass singing of ‘Don’t look back in anger’ and the usual appeals for unity, hope and not hating. Of course, it would not be Britain following an Islamic atrocity without the usual mindless regurgitation made by know-nothings of the claim that ‘Islam is a religion of peace’.

The justifiable public anger at more mass deaths caused by deranged followers of Islam was suitably earthed and made safe by public displays of grief and communality and was followed up, months later by the inevitable public inquiry. It was there that we found out that this family of savages had been brought to Britain as ‘refugees’ and that the police, the Security Service (MI5) and other agencies had missed chances to stop the savage before he engaged in mass murder. An MI5 officer during the inquiry told of the service being overwhelmed by work and being concerned that someone with bad intent could slip through because of the amount of data and paperwork that were attached to each case. MI5 knew about this particular nasty murdering savage and moved very slowly, as did the police, with regards this savage even though concerns had been raised about him for years, including concerns from within Libyan diaspora communities in the UK.

The pattern of Establishment encouraged public displays of grief, public vigils, candle lighting and admonishments to ‘come together’ and ‘reject hate’ is becoming very visible now in the aftermath of the Nottingham Horror. I’ve little doubt that as time goes by and of course following the trial of the man that the police are holding on murder charges over this atrocity, that there will be an inquiry. I’m confident that this inquiry will, as so many others have done, expose a number of incompetences by the police, Home Office and other agencies that are relevant in this case.

Maybe this time we should not make the mistakes of the past by allowing the Establishment to get away with the mealy mouthed term ‘lessons will be learned’ from this latest violent atrocity. It’s quite possible to do that by not allowing ourselves to be immersed in guided public grief but staying angry about what has been done to our nation by the incompetent, the easily led and the dogmatic who rule over and administer this nation. We should be angry at the legion of knaves in the Civil Service who allowed the alleged murdering bastard of Nottingham to remain in the country despite being a violent madman and its right to be angry at the political class (and yes with very few Labour MP’s being working class there is now a real political class) who either encouraged open borders policies or didn’t care about them because it didn’t affect them. Is there any other justifiable emotion other than anger when the political and administrative classes have failed so often to stop terrorist and similar atrocities when they could and should have done or who have actively colluded in bringing in people who really should have been kept out of the UK?

If anger is the right way to go then it must be intelligent anger. Stupid anger is counterproductive. As I have said so often on here on the subject of Islamic extremism, it’s not the fault of ‘Joe Mohammed-from-the-tyre-shop’ that we have a problem with violent Islamic extremism. In the same way we should not blame innocent ‘Pastor Ademola from Nigeria’ for the crimes of the Nottingham murderer who allegedly comes from the same continent as them. The fault for this incident and other terror atrocities lie at the very beginning with those in authority. Fault lies with those who have not taken Islamic and violent migrant threats seriously or who have been paralysed by political correctness into doing nothing or who have taken a less than critical and cynical view of violent cultures and belief systems and those religious ideologies that embrace violence as well as those who might have been sold theological snake oil by Islamic and left leaning/pro-open borders advisors to the UK government.

Our intelligent anger must be targeted on the ballot box. There, instead of voting for one of two or at most three Westminster political turds, defined only by different coloured rosettes and which are the cause of many of our present problems, we should vote differently. We should vote in our own interests, not the interests of others, especially those others who hate us. We should vote for our own security not for security for those who mean us harm and vote for those who will build and not for those who wish to destroy.

We can’t keep voting for the same Big Three parties that have created the mess that we are in today. They’ve had enough time and power given to them by the British people to sort out the problems that often these parties have created and caused themselves.

At election time let us not be fobbed off again by admonishments to ‘not look back in anger’. Of course we should grieve for the lives that have been lost in all of these Jihadist and migrant centred attacks, but also let’s stay angry and use that anger, not in any sort of destructive way but instead as a form of political energy. We should use this anger based energy thoughtfully and vote out those who have messed up so badly that sometimes it’s difficult to distinguish between whether our political class is merely terminally incompetent or whether they truly hate and despise the British people. Take your anger at, not just the Nottingham Horror, but all the other similar ones to the Ballot Box and vote for something better than what we have currently got ruling over us.