There’s been at least one bit of good news for Britain this week and that is the decision of the Court of Appeal to deny UK citizenship to the Jihadi bride and Islamic terror supporter Shamima Begum. The court unanimously found that it was correct and legal for the then Home Secretary Sajid Javid to remove UK citizenship from Begum who is also a Bangladeshi national.

The Guardian said:

Lawyers for Shamima Begum have vowed to “keep fighting” to bring her home after they failed in a fresh attempt to overturn a decision to remove her British citizenship after the court of appeal ruled against her.

Three judges unanimously concluded that the then home secretary, Sajid Javid, had the power to set aside concerns she may have been a victim of child trafficking when she left east London as a schoolgirl and travelled in secret with two friends to live under Islamic State (IS) in 2015.

The court also held that Javid had acted lawfully even if it meant Begum, now 24, was effectively stateless – because she theoretically held Bangladeshi citizenship, which applied up to her 21st birthday, at the time of his decision in 2019.

An argument raised by her lawyers, that citizenship deprivation disproportionately affected British Muslims, and so was a breach of equalities law, was also dismissed because there is an exemption for cases involving national security.

Begum’s lawyers say that they are going to appeal again to the Supreme Court but with such a unanimous decision by the Court of Appeal and few evidential or legal grounds for appeal I can’t see this being overturned by the Supreme Court. Unless some sort of legal miracle/disaster occurs to make the Supreme Court think differently, the most likely outcome of the Court of Appeal’s decision is that we are finally rid of the Islamic extremist Shamima Begum.

I’m glad that the court didn’t by they Muslim whining of Begum’s lawyers who tried to claim that citizenship deprivation disproportionally affected Muslims. However this lawyer seems to have failed to understand that the reason that Muslims are disproportionally affected by citizenship removal is Muslims are more likely that non-Muslims as a proportion of the British population to engage in terrorist activities. If Muslims were not so ready to support bestial terrorist movements like ISIS or Hamas then they would be at less risk of losing their British citizenship. We don’t see many naturalised Nigerian origin Christians being deprived of citizenship because of religiously inspired terrorism because clearly this is a very minor problem, unlike the many thousands of Muslims who choose to engage in terrorism and support various types of Islamic death cult.

The Left as can be expected have been frothing at the mouth at this decision even going so far as to claim that the then 15 year old Begum was ‘groomed’ into supporting terror and making excuses for her because she was ‘only 15’. Some such as Harriet Harman made the claim that Begum was groomed and said: ‘She was a British girl groomed and lured abroad for sex. Ludicrous to call her a “bride”. She was a victim. Cruel to make her stateless. Compassion needed here.’ I say bollocks to ‘compassion’ for Begum and I feel that it is correct to point out that Ms Harman has had very little to say about the crimes of mass rape and grooming of British girls that has been done by Muslims. Ms Harman is quite willing to go out and shill for a fucking terrorist but not willing to stand up for British girls being victimised by Muslims.

Those who have made the claim that Begum should be given leeway because she was 15 when she went to join ISIS are also talking rubbish as well. I’m older now but I can remember when I was 15 and I can remember it with a very large amount of cringe. Yes I like many 15 year olds did some utterly stupid and dangerous things, sometimes involving in climbing on top of gasometers and using them like a drum or supporting the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, but I never for one moment thought that joining up with a murderous bestial terrorist group was something that I should have considered.

What is good about the decision of the Court of Appeal is that the lead judge in this case Dame Sue recognised the culpability of Begum and rejected the idea that she was ‘groomed’ or was vulnerable because of age. According to the Guardian report she said: “It could be argued that the decision in Miss Begum’s case was harsh’ but added “It could also be argued that Miss Begum is the author of her own misfortune. But it is not for this court to agree or disagree with either point of view.

“Our only task is to assess whether the deprivation decision was unlawful. We have concluded it was not and the appeal is dismissed.”

Shamima Begum was indeed the architect of her own downfall. She chose, possibly with the connivance of other East London Bangladeshis, that going to join ISIS was the Islamically correct way to proceed when contacted by those Muslims who supported ISIS.

We should be glad about the decision of the Court of Appeal to agree that exiling Begum was the correct thing to do. It’s one less Islamic traitor who is able to enter Britain and make life shit for both Britain’s non-Muslim majority and those Muslims who are as equally horrified by Islamic extremism as the rest of us are. Although we should be pleased that Begum can no longer call herself British and that this is now one less Islamic extremist to worry about it should also worry us that there at least 40,000 other mostly Islamic extremists whom we also urgently need to be rid of.