From Elsewhere: Sir Keir Starmer the man who believes in nothing.

 

There’s a brilliant article in Spiked Magazine examining the career or Sir Keir Starmer the Labour Party leader. It paints a picture of a man with no principles and no beliefs other than siding with whatever ideology that will bring him power. Sir Keir served as a shadow cabinet minister under the odious Jeremy Corbyn yet today claims that he was unhappy about the number of Jew haters who prospered in the party under Corbyn’s leadership. If it is truly the case that Sir Keir was concerned about the Labour Party emulating the Jew hatred found in the fascist parties like the National Front and the BNP, then why didn’t he put his money where his mouth was and say something back then? If he wanted to make clear that he was unhappy with the direction that the Labour Party was taking then him speaking out and maybe resigning his shadow cabinet position might have done some good.

The Spiked article, written by Spiked editor Tom Slater, calls Sir Keir ‘slippery’ and brings up plenty of examples where ‘slippery’ is the least that could be said about Sir Keir. The lists of political position flip flops and betrayals that Mr Slater records is astonishing and well worth a read.

Mr Slater said of Sir Keir

This is not a man changing his views in light of new arguments, data or circumstances. This is a man who either believes in nothing, or is lying about what he actually believes, in order to get into power. Thinking about it, I’m not entirely sure which is worse.

Keir Starmer: Mr Honesty, Mr Integrity, Mr Moral Socialism? Please… He might just be the slipperiest, most unprincipled politician we’ve seen for many years. And in a few weeks’ time, he could be your prime minister.

3 Comments on "From Elsewhere: Sir Keir Starmer the man who believes in nothing."

  1. Philip Copson | June 14, 2024 at 12:43 pm |

    pace “The Man Who Wasn’t There” – Starmer should be characterised as “The Man Who Isn’t There”

    • Fahrenheit211 | June 14, 2024 at 1:04 pm |

      Good point there. However shouldn’t the term ‘the man who isn’t there’ apply to Biden?

  2. 👍

Comments are closed.